Search for: "Pfizer, A Delaware Corporation"
Results 1 - 20
of 69
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2019, 6:00 am
Pfizer Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 7:43 pm
Pfizer, Inc., C.A. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 6:43 am
But CureVac could have sued in the Southern District of New York (Pfizer HQ), which has recently also been a pretty good venue for patent holders to assert their rights, or in the District of Delaware (Pfizer is a Delaware corporation, as are possibly other parties).Pfizer and BioNTech are seeking declarations of non-infringement, not of invalidity. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 12:56 pm
" Even if these policies don’t put the company’s bottom line at risk, Delaware, where Pfizer is incorporated, still holds corporate officers liable for "knowing violation[s] of the law. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 9:39 pm
In this particular case Pfizer, a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in New York, brought an ANDA suit against Sandoz, Inc., a Colorado corporation with its principal place of business in New Jersey, but also with its primary manufacturing plant located in Colorado. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 12:58 pm
This afternoon we are lucky to be here with Justice Jacobs of the Delaware Supreme Court to discuss Important Developments in Delaware Corporate Law. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
PFIZER, INC., and PHARMACIA CORPORATION Defendants. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 10:23 am
Pfizer is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in New York. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 6:04 am
The stated purpose for this inspection was apparently to investigate possible waste or mismanagement, a traditionally accepted basis for inspection under Section 220 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 3:41 pm
Thereafter, several derivative actions were filed seeking to recover from the alleged corporate wrongdoers. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 8:01 am
State laws, led by Delaware, provide multiple levels of safeguards to protect the interests of minority shareholders, such as shareholder-led proxy solicitations, demand letters to corporate boards to take or refrain from certain actions, as well as state-granted appraisal rights. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 8:03 pm
More recently, in Pfizer, Inc. v Arch Ins. [read post]
28 May 2010, 5:00 am
As for preemption of state law, it is something Delaware has brought on itself. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 9:11 am
Actavis Elizabeth LLC, Anchen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Anchen Incorporated (patent infringement) 10/6: Pfizer Inc., Pfizer Pharmaceuticals LLC, Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer Limited and CP Pharmaceuticals International CV v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 12:47 pm
Extra corporate income tax revenues to the federal government don't pay for Delaware's corporate law regime, and (as the paper notes) U.S. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 5:50 am
Nov. 22, 1988); Pfizer Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 8:00 am
(patent infringement) 1/14: Daiichi Sankyo Inc.and Genzyme Corporation v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 4:22 am
Pfizer-style) and several directors do not receive a majority of the vote in the election, the board's subsequent rejection of the directors' resignation letters is not, by itself, enough to serve as a credible basis of wrongdoing in a books and records request brought under Section 220 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:59 am
Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation and Sharp Electronics Manufacturing Company of America Inc. [read post]
